Data-driven PPC engineered for ROI, not vanity metrics — run by a Google Premier Partner team.
Explore →Own the map pack and the organic results with compounding, data-backed search authority.
Explore →High-converting custom websites engineered to turn clicks into booked calls.
Explore →Maps, reviews & reputation — bundles with any plan
Content marketing comes with every website build. Reputation management comes with Google Business Profile. No bloated bundles — just the three channels that grow your business.
No specialty lives the two patient economies more literally than dermatology: medical derm bills insurance at volume, cosmetic derm sells cash-pay treatments at retail margins — often from the same exam room. A verified 25.33% conversion rate (the best in healthcare search) and an $18.54 average CPL make this the friendliest auction in medicine — if the campaigns are forked correctly.
Dermatology is the two-economy problem in its purest form. The medical side — skin-cancer screenings, acne, eczema, psoriasis, Mohs surgery — is an insurance business: access, network fit, and volume. The cosmetic side — injectables, lasers, peels, body treatments — is a cash business: credentials, outcomes, and the income-qualified patient. Both search for “dermatologist near me,” but they are different buyers with different triggers, and marketing that treats them as one audience wastes money on both.
The benchmarks make derm the friendliest auction in healthcare: the LocaliQ dataset (3,542 US campaigns, Oct 2024–Sep 2025) records a $4.90 average CPC, a 25.33% average conversion rate — the highest of all 16 specialties measured — and an $18.54 average cost per lead. That conversion rate is what direct-booking intent looks like: a patient with a suspicious mole or an acne flare is not browsing, she is booking.
The strategic question is the mix. Medicare cut the 2025 physician fee schedule 2.83% — the fifth straight year of cuts — so every insurance-side patient pays back slower than last year, while the cosmetic side keeps retail margins intact. Practices that grow deliberately shift the blend toward cash-pay treatments without starving the medical volume that feeds the schedule — and that shift is a marketing decision: which campaigns get the budget, which landing pages get the traffic.
Execution detail decides it. Insurance-economy keywords need insurance-verification CTAs and same-week-availability messaging; cosmetic keywords need galleries, pricing transparency, and financing CTAs. One practice, two page architectures — forked deliberately, measured separately, reported as two economies rather than one blended average that hides both.
Medical-dermatology and cosmetic-dermatology searches we target — forked by economy — and the budget-drainers we strike before they cost you a dollar.
| Search term | Est. CPC band | Intent |
|---|---|---|
| dermatologist near me | $4–6 | Direct-booking · the head term |
| dermatologist accepting [insurance] | $4–6 | Insurance-fit · access intent |
| skin cancer screening near me | $3–5 | Medical · high urgency |
| acne treatment dermatologist | $4–6 | Medical · teen + adult segments |
| eczema specialist near me | $4–6 | Medical · chronic care value |
| mole removal cost | $3–5 | Cost intent · insurance fork |
| cosmetic dermatologist [city] | $5–9 | Cash economy · consult intent |
| botox cost [city] | $4–8 | Cash intent · drug-name copy rules |
| laser hair removal near me | $4–7 | Cash · package economics |
| chemical peel cost | $3–5 | Cash · cost/research intent |
| mohs surgeon [city] | $5–9 | Surgical · referral + direct |
| best dermatologist [city] | $5–8 | Credential shopping · both economies |
Just as important as the searches we buy are the ones we block. Negative keywords tell Google to never show your ad for these searches — so job-seekers, students, and researchers never spend a dollar of your budget:
The fork applies to income targeting too: cosmetic campaigns layer household-income brackets and affluent ZIPs; medical campaigns stay broad, because the insurance economy is won on access, not affluence.
Injectables, lasers, and peels are retail purchases. We bid up the top 10% and 11–20% brackets, build cash-pay ZIP lists from Census ACS and IRS data, and exclude the lower brackets so cosmetic spend only reaches households that buy elective treatments.
Skin checks and acne do not care about income — the patient has a card and a copay. Medical campaigns run wide, win on “accepts your plan” and “same-week appointments,” and feed the schedule volume the practice runs on.
Meta targets household income by ZIP in four tiers (top 5%, 10%, 10–25%, 25–50%) — the primary affluence filter since detailed targeting exclusions were removed in June 2025. Cosmetic creative runs only in the tiers that convert.
Performance Max gained household-income exclusions in 2025–2026. Where we run it for derm, the exclusion set mirrors the Search posture: tight on cosmetic, open on medical.
Dermatology's direct-booking intent makes it the cleanest channel story in medicine — Search captures, GBP converts, SEO compounds the cosmetic margin.
“Dermatologist near me accepting Cigna” and “botox cost [city]” are different buyers and never share an ad group. Forked Search campaigns — insurance-verification CTAs on one side, consult-and-financing CTAs on the other — put you in front of ready-to-book patients within days.
For local medical searches the map pack is often the first thing a patient taps — and roughly half avoid providers with incomplete profiles. We optimize categories (medical and cosmetic services listed separately), photos, Q&A, and review velocity so the profile passes the three-second credibility test.
Condition pages (“eczema treatment [city]”) build medical volume; cost and comparison pages (“botox vs filler,” “chemical peel cost”) build cosmetic margin. Rankings you don't rent, compounding underneath the paid engine.
Google restricts before/after imagery in healthcare ads — so the gallery lives on your site as the cosmetic side's strongest conversion asset, organized by treatment and built for mobile. Ads carry credentials and outcomes language instead.
Prescription drug names are banned in ad copy unless the advertiser holds LegitScript certification. We write high-performing injectables ads without them — treatment-category language, pricing framing, and outcomes — and guide you through certification if you want the names.
Medical keywords land on insurance-verification pages with availability messaging; cosmetic keywords land on gallery-led pages with consult and financing CTAs. The fork is the difference between an 8% and a 25% conversion rate on the same click price.
We lead with the channels that produce kept appointments — and report the two economies separately, never as one blended average.
Prescription-drug copy restrictions, before/after policy, and privacy law all touch a derm account. Here is how we build it.
Server-side tracking and first-party data, architected so appointment forms and call recordings never leak patient information into Google or Meta. The AHA v. Becerra ruling (June 2024) narrowed the HHS pixel guidance, but the $12.2M Advocate Aurora and $6.6M Novant settlements mean liability is lawsuit-driven — we build as if the strictest reading applies.
Google bans prescription drug names and active ingredients in ads unless the advertiser holds LegitScript certification — that covers the biggest brand names in injectables. We write around them with treatment-category language, and guide your practice through certification if you want to run them. We guide; you hold the certification.
Before/after photos are restricted in healthcare ads on Google and Meta. The gallery converts on your website instead — organized, fast, mobile-first — while ads carry credentials, experience, and pricing transparency.
Google's personalized-ads policy prohibits remarketing on pages about health conditions, symptoms, or treatments. We build first-party audiences from your own scheduling data and use on-platform lead forms and Smart Bidding signals — no PHI, no policy risk.
An illustrative model at verified dermatology medians: a $4.90 CPC and a 25.33% conversion rate on a $5,000 monthly budget.
Illustrative model — not client data. CPC and conversion rate are verified LocaliQ medians (Oct 2024–Sep 2025); the 60% show rate is a planning target we manage toward. Real numbers vary by market and intake discipline.
A representative model for a single-market dermatology practice at verified LocaliQ medians — illustrative of the approach, not a specific client. If even a third of those kept appointments carry an average $350 combined visit value (medical visit or cosmetic treatment — an illustrative estimate), 155 kept appointments model to roughly $54,250 in visit revenue against $5,000 of spend: a 10.8× first-visit return, before recall visits and treatment plans.
Dedicated city guides for the five metros we cover in this specialty — local search economics, the medical-cosmetic mix, and the exact playbook we run in each market.
Dermatology marketing in Miami — cosmetic demand meets year-round sun.
Open the guide →Dermatology marketing in Tampa — a two-economy Gulf Coast market.
Open the guide →Dermatology marketing in Orlando — high-volume search, local buyers.
Open the guide →Dermatology marketing in Jacksonville — our home market, mapped ZIP by ZIP.
Open the guide →Dermatology marketing in Atlanta — the Southeast's deepest patient pool.
Open the guide →A 30-minute practice-strategy call: your medical-cosmetic mix, your market, and exactly where the next booked appointments come from. No obligation.
Matched ad credit for new Google Ads accounts through our Premier Partner program.